A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in the trademark
infringement case between sports artist Daniel Moore and the University
of Alabama, whose football program is portrayed in a number of his
works.
They present their cases to the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta on Thursday.
The university filed suit in 2005 alleging that Moore violated trademark
law in painting scenes from football games by showing Crimson Tide
players in their crimson and white uniforms without permission.
The suit also contends that Moore reissued previously licensed prints without paying royalties.
A federal judge's ruling in 2009 found that Moore's paintings and prints
were protected but that other items ? like coffee mugs ? weren't. Both
sides appealed.
"The University of Alabama believes the court ruled correctly when it
found that Daniel Moore and his company engaged in activities that
infringe on the University's trademarks," university spokeswoman Deborah
Lane said in a statement. "While we regret the necessity of having to
involve the courts in this matter, the lawsuit was necessary since UA
must protect the value and reputation of our trademarks, name, colors,
indicia and logos, by determining who uses them, as well as when and how
they are used."
Moore denied violating trademark laws and said his art constitutes free speech protected by the U.S. Constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment